代写英文论文：归因理论和阐述可能性理论
特朗普因为局势而让它成为一个问题。一个未来的总统应该认识到这是一个他将来要解决的问题。这样的总统会用他的技巧来面对这个问题。他与公众的沟通应该包括一些应对的方法，他可以列出一些他可以处理这件事的个人观点或长处。但他没能做到这一点，这实际上造成了一个归因错误。
其次，考虑在一个类似活动的例子中应用的阐述可能性理论。在竞选的辩论中，一个人所使用的批判性思维的数量与他个人参与辩论的程度成正比。一个在说理上走在中间路线的人会在他们的竞选陈述中更投入，这将在他们的竞选中表现出诚意。他们往往比那些在边缘层面工作的人更了解这个问题。在边缘水平，例如来源可信度会比自我批判思维更有效。在大多数情况下，要想成功地进行交流，就必须将外围信号和中心信号结合起来。即使在中心路线上，一些不那么关键的因素也会影响到人的影响力。
加拿大论文代写：归因理论和阐述可能性理论
考虑一下巴拉克·奥巴马(Barack Obama)在当选总统并成功连任两届之前的总统竞选活动，作为阐述可能性理论的一个例子。在竞选中，注意他的妻子米歇尔·奥巴马的影响，这将被讨论如下。米歇尔·奥巴马很清楚自己的处境，也很清楚如何展示她的丈夫巴拉克·奥巴马的理想和政策。她的话语和演讲同样有力，可以被理解为以中心层面为导向。周边的线索，如她的时尚和着装风格，也在决定她的态度方面发挥了重要作用，这加强了她的整体沟通。梅拉尼娅·特朗普(Melania Trump)和剽窃问题是未来第一夫人在边缘层面运作的一个例子，因为这表明她没有在核心层面运作。她没有意识到自己的演讲抄袭了米歇尔·奥巴马之前的演讲。她没有承担个人责任，而是把它归咎于她助手的错误。研究表明，梅拉尼娅·特朗普既犯了归因错误，也在外围水平线索上操作。
结论
被选择的两种人际交往理论是归因理论和阐述似然理论。通过研究文章论证，对这两种理论进行了讨论。该研究还提出了如何将这些理论用于公共传播实践的方法。
加拿大代写被抓：归因理论和阐述可能性理论
Trump made it a problem because of situation. A President to be, should have recognized it as a problem that the he will be expected to solve in future. Such a President would have faced it with his skills. His communication to the public should have included some ways to deal with it, and he could have listed out some personal opinion or strengths with which he could have handled it. He failed to do so and was essentially creating an attribution error.
Secondly consider the theory of Elaboration Likelihood as applied in a similar campaign example. In an argument in a campaign, the amount of critical thinking that a person employs will be directly proportional to how much they are personally involved in it. A person who is in the central route when it comes to reasoning will be more involved in their campaign presentation and this will show as sincerity in their campaigns. They would tend to be more knowledgeable about the issue compared to another who operates at a peripheral level. In the peripheral level, source credibility for instance will be given more validity than self-critical thinking. Now in most cases, it would be necessary to include a combination of peripheral and central cues in order to present successful communication. Even when in the central route, some less critical factor can also affect the influence of the person.
多伦多大学代写：归因理论和阐述可能性理论
Consider the Presidential campaign of Barack Obama before he was elected the President and ran for two successful terms as an example of the Elaboration Likelihood theory. In the campaign, note the influence of his wife Michelle Obama, which will be discussed as follows. Michelle Obama was knowledgeable about her situation, and how to present the ideal and policies of her husband Barack Obama. Her words and speeches were just as powerful and can be understood as being central level oriented. Peripheral level cues such as her fashion and style of dressing also played an important role in deciding her attitude and this strengthened her overall communication. As an example of a future first lady operating at Peripheral level, consider Melania Trump and the issue of plagiarism, as it shows how she was not operating at the central level. She failed to recognize that her speech was plagiarized from Michelle Obama’s past speech. Instead of taking personal responsibility, she attributed it as an error of her assistant. It showed that Melania Trump was making both an attribution error and was operating at peripheral level cues.
Conclusion
The two human communication theories that were selected are the attribution theory and the Elaboration Likelihood theory. Both theories were discussed through research article arguments. The work also presented ways on how the theories can be used to inform public communication practices.
