澳洲卧龙岗大学论文代写：全球经济秩序
第3章追溯了全球经济秩序的产生。在这里，作者介绍了美国成为新的霸主，“有垄断原子武器，持有近一半的世界货币储备和世界黄金供应量的三分之二，拥有全球生产能力的一半，美国因此占据了主导地位在世界政治与经济”（41）。这是一个值得考虑的问题，因为美国经常被指责为其霸权议程。这更令人感兴趣，因为东亚经济体的出现或多或少是在这个世界主导的发展时期之后出现的。它是否对新兴经济体产生了影响，或者抑制了新兴东亚经济体的经济增长，这是读者在阅读本文时想要分析的问题。后来引起的这种兴趣得到了进一步的支持，作者声称：“战后的自由世界经济秩序为战后资本主义国家的经济关系的发展提供了一个框架”（43）。东亚经济当时不是资本主义经济，而是新兴经济体。新兴经济体是如何受到资本主义经济的推动的？在此，强调了外部行为者对区域经济的重要性。争论和讨论中有一致性。虽然理论上和事实上支持，这本书不包括数字，表格或图表。这是一个严肃而有计划的讨论。它不邀请读者参与；有一种清醒可能让读者无私。第一章绪论和第二章的相关理论和分析框架演示吸引读者，但随着章，有一个职位空缺数据、图表和更让读者着迷。这本书不见了。第5章价格较好，因为它能够提供关于出口实际价值和更多的数据表。此外，对东亚经济体的比较也与美国的经济进行了比较。这种比较分析的形式有助于读者推测新的观点和联系，也可以利用这本书作为主要来源参与未来的研究。
澳洲卧龙岗大学论文代写：全球经济秩序
In chapter 3, the author traces the creation of the Global economic order. Here the author presents that the United States became a new hegemon, “Having the monopoly over atomic weapons, holding almost half of the world’s monetary reserves and two-thirds of the world’s gold supply and possessing half of the world’s manufacturing capacity, the US thus occupied the predominant position in world politics and economics” (41). This is an interesting point to consider, as the United States is often accused of its hegemonic agenda. This is further more interesting to note as the emergence of the East Asian economies is more or less after the time of the development of this world dominant. Did it have an effect on the emerging economies or did it suppress the economic growth of the emerging East-Asian economies is a question that a reader would like to analyze on reading this. This interest that is evoked is furthermore supported later where the author claims “this postwar liberal world economic order was then to provide a framework for the development of economic relations among capitalist countries in the postwar years” (43). East Asian economies were not capitalist economies then, but these were emerging economies. How did the emerging economies get boosted by the capitalist economies? Herein the significance of the external actors on regional economies is highlighted. There is a consistency in the arguments and discussion line. Although supported theoretically and with facts, the book does not include figures, tables or diagrams. It is a serious and composed discussion on the topic. It does not invite the reader to participate; there is a sense of sobriety which might leave the reader disinterested. The first two chapters-the introduction and chapter 2-the theories and analytical framework presentations hook the reader, but with the passing chapters, there is a vacancy for data, diagrams and more to keep the reader hooked. This is missing in the book. Chapter 5 fares better here as it is able to provide tables of data on the actual value of exports and more. Furthermore, a comparison on the East Asian Economies is done with the economy of the United States. This form of a comparative analysis helps reader to speculate on newer ideas and connections and also take part in future research using the book as a main source.
