Assignment First

毕业论文代写:苏格拉底证据驳斥Thrasymachus统治

Thrasymachus对统治艺术进行了明确的评价,统治艺术被认为是提升占有者自身利益的专业技能。这是以规则为代价的。因此,苏格拉底努力用具体的证据驳斥Thrasymachus。证据是,具有真正专长的是公正,而不是不公正。苏格拉底倾向于诉诸于专业知识的性质和属性来起草伦理观点。苏格拉底的一个关键策略是展示,就其本质而言,专长总是专注于在特定的案例情境中,提供尽可能好的行动。因此,统治者应采取有利于被统治者的行动,而不是策划对被统治者的剥削。

毕业论文代写:苏格拉底证据驳斥Thrasymachus统治

另一项战略表明,拥有专门知识并不能提供相对成功的概念。这意味着,专家衡量个人成功的标准既不是通过提供比别人更好的业绩,也不是通过努力达到客观标准。但是,非专家对客观标准没有任何认识,因此,可以根据比较来估计是否成功。这意味着在任何情况下,专家都不负责衡量个人的成功。

毕业论文代写:苏格拉底证据驳斥Thrasymachus统治

Thrasymachus has clearly appraised the art of rulership which is considered as an expertise for the advancement of self interest among the possessor. This is specific at the cost of the ruled. Hence, Socrates puts in efforts for refuting Thrasymachus by specific proofs. The proof was that it is justice instead of injustice for featuring genuine expertise. Socrates tends to appeal the nature and attributes of expertise for drafting out ethical points. One of the key strategies of Socrates is for showing that by its very nature, an expertise always focuses on delivering best actions as best possible in specific case scenarios. Hence, the rulership should deliver actions for benefitting the ruled instead of planning out their exploitation.

毕业论文代写:苏格拉底证据驳斥Thrasymachus统治

Another strategy was showing that the possession of expertise do not provide a notion of being successful comparatively. This means that an expert will not be measuring personal success either by delivering better performance than the other, or by trying best to meet the objective standards. However, the non-expert will not be having any knowledge about the objective standard and hence, there can be estimation of success in terms of comparison. This means that an expert is not responsible for measuring his individual success in any case scenario.