代写文章：吃动物是否正确的辩论
人类吃食物是为了生存，他们中的大多数人不考虑他们所吃的东西的影响，因为他们喜欢的味道，也不关心原因和后果。洛马斯基在他的文章《吃动物是错的吗?“认为吃动物和动物肉是可以的，因为它的目的是吃得好，吃让人的生活更充实。”洛玛斯基还认为，一些行为，包括饮食，如果不执行，生活完全减少。本文将为动物辩护，反对洛马斯基关于吃动物是正确的观点。
这是一个非常有效的观点，因为当动物不能表达它们的时候，这并不意味着它们是非理性的，如果为了食物而被杀死，它们就无足轻重了。人类的道德准则不允许人类无视动物所带来的价值而剥夺任何动物的生命权。如果自然反过来，动物开始把人类当作它们的资源，理性的人类就会再次与之对抗，证明动物的微不足道的价值，并把它们杀害人类的行为称为完全不理性。因此，今天人类面临着同样的问题:如果他们为了满足味蕾而心甘情愿地杀害动物，这是一种什么样的理性行为?在道德伦理的视野下，如何才能证明这种行为是理性的?人类需要采取普遍的仁爱态度。
动物是固有的存在，具有被大多数人所否定的固有价值，尤其是那些为了满足味蕾而鼓励捕杀动物的人。这种行为在道德上是不可靠的，并证明了人类理性的主张是错误的。动物不应被视为资源，而应被视为受尊重和培育的有情众生。
代写文章 ：吃动物是否正确的辩论
Humans eat food to survive and most of them do not consider the impacts of what they eat as far as they like the taste and do not bother about the causes and consequences. Lomasky in his article ‘Is it wrong to eat animals?’ considers that it is alright to eat animals and animals meat as it serves a purpose of eating well, and eating to make the human life more fulfilling. Lomasky also believes that some practices including eating if not performed, life is diminished completely. This paper will argue for the animals and against Lomasky’s take about eating animals being right.
This is a very valid point, because since when animals are not able to express them it does not mean that they are irrational and are insignificant if killed for food. The moral code of humanity does not allow humans to deny the right of life to any animal regardless of the value the animals bring forward. If nature turns the other way and animals start considering humans as their resources, the rational human will then again contend against it by proving the negligible value of animals and terming their killing humans as completely irrational. Thus, the same question faces humans today which asks them that if they are willingly killing animals for fulfilling their taste buds, what kind of a rational behavior is that and how can it be proved to be rational under the lens of morality and ethics. It is required for humanity to adopt an attitude of universal benevolence (Linzey).
Animals are inherent beings and have inherent value which is denied by majority of humans, especially those who encourage killing animals for fulfilling their taste buds. The action is morally unreliable and disproves the claim of rationality in humans. Animals must not be seen as resources, but as sentient beings that are to be respected and nurtured.
