Femininity refers to behaviour and ideas associated with womanliness or normative female sexuality, separable from women’s anatomical sex. As intersexual, men and women can all possess femininity, so historically the organization of this quality is quite diverse. Particularly in the transnational movement of ideas, practices and habits, conflicts occur over how feminine normality is to be understood and enforced. Thus it is important to explore femininity y as such in relation to political spatiality’s or regions. In light of current Pacific Area politics and commodity flows it is illuminating to see questions of femininity via regional politics among Tokyo, London, New York, Shanghai and Beijing rather than, for instance, Buenos Aires, Mexico, Madrid, Paris and Washington. Events in Tokyo, London, Washington, Shanghai and Beijing lay at the bottom of one crisis that erupted over the question of who definitively owned normal femininity in the period of colonial modernity (circa 1842–1937). The power of transnational capital to transform states and rewrite interregional trade relations accelerated in the mid-19th century, when Brit ain, the United States and other imperialists sought to marketise China and Japan and assimilate the Korean peninsula into a new region named the Far East (now East Asia).
女性是指行为和观念与女性气质或规范性的女性的性行为，女性解剖性分离。为两性，男人和女人都能拥有女性，所以历史上这个组织是相当不同的质量。特别是在跨国流动的思想，行为和习惯，反对fl信息和通信技术发生在女性正常是如何理解和执行。因此重要的是探讨女性的这种关系的政治空间或区域。鉴于目前的太平洋fi区域政治和商品fl认为它是启发看看问题的女性通过区域政治在东京，伦敦，纽约，上海和北京比，例如，布宜诺斯艾利斯，墨西哥，马德里，巴黎和华盛顿。事件在东京，华盛顿，伦敦，上海和北京在底部的一个危机爆发的问题谁的finitively拥有正常的女性在殖民地时期的现代性（大约1842–1937）。权力的跨国资本转变和重写区际贸易关系加速在19世纪时，英国，美国和其他帝国主义者试图marketise中国和日本和朝鲜半岛新到一个地区命名为远东（现在东亚）。
