Synopsis
Healthy competition among businesses is crucial for market sustainability. The lawsuit involving Intel Corp. and Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) illustrates the importance of this principle as the two companies sought legal help to ensure that they were being given a fair chance to compete in the market. Intel and AMD are both renowned names in the field of manufacturing microprocessor chips for personal computers. Intel has enormous 70% share in the micro-chip market while AMD (info.com), though the second largest manufacturer holds only 20% of market foothold. These two companies have over the years gained so much experience and technical expertise that it enables them to dominate the market without encountering any competition from potential manufacturers who are faced with significant barriers to entry. (Mackenzie 225)
AMD filed a lawsuit against Intel, stating that the latter had established its monopoly in the microprocessor market which was detrimental to competition and prevented AMD from doing business with computer companies. A history of Intel’s previous lawsuits indicates that the AMD accusation is not new in this regard (AMD-Intel Litigation history, 2007).
企业之间的竞争是市场的健康可持续发展的关键。诉讼涉及英特尔和高级微设备公司（AMD）说明了这一原则的两个公司寻求法律帮助，以确保它们是在市场竞争的公平机会的重要性。英特尔和AMD都是著名的名字在制造微处理器芯片领域的个人电脑。英特尔已经在微芯片市场70%的份额，而AMD（巨大的信息。com），虽然第二大制造商仅持有20%的市场立足点。这两个公司在过去几年取得了如此多的经验和专业技术，它使他们能够主导市场没有遇到谁都面临着重大障碍的潜在厂商进入任何竞争。（麦肯齐225）
AMD对英特尔提起诉讼，称后者，不利于从电脑公司做生意的竞争和防止AMD微处理器市场的垄断，建立。以前的英特尔的诉讼的历史表明，AMD的指控是没有新的在这方面（AMD英特尔诉讼的历史，2007）。
