加拿大犯罪学论文代写：案件分析
在本案中，由于克劳德的疏忽和克劳德的雇员巴勃罗的侵权行为，文森特蒙受了重大损失。结果，文森特想向克劳德索赔损失。然而，克劳德指出，事实上，有一个通知上提到的收据是给文森特的克劳德，而购买油漆。根据本通知，克劳德不能对可能造成的损失承担责任。这张收据是在购买油漆时发出的。同样地，在柜台上也出现了一个符号，上面的字重复了一遍。因此，克劳德拒绝支付这些通知的赔偿。因此，它需要在这种情况下，决定如果这些免责条款可以保护克劳德从支付由有缺陷的涂料在文森特的客户价值20000美元的建筑造成的损害赔偿也被画了文森特的储藏室爆炸罐造成的损害，引起价值40000美元的艺术品损坏。
法律规定：在合同法的语境中，排除条款可以称为合同一方当事人试图限制或排除其违约责任的条款。例如，在A和B之间的合同的情况下，它可以提供在一个过失的情况下由B公司员工，B不能承担违约或它也可以提供，如果B被判违约，在这种情况下，乙方将不支付超过500美元的损害赔偿金。需要注意的是，这种排除条款通常是有效的，如果他们已经得到适当的起草，同时，他们已被纳入合同。因此，为了免责条款，要求这种条款在合同中被适当地纳入，同时也要求它不违反法律。
加拿大犯罪学论文代写：案件分析
In the present case, significant loss has been suffered by Vincent as a result of the negligence of Claude and the tort committed by Pablo, an employee of Claude. As a result, Vincent wants to claim damages from Claude. However, Claude points out towards the fact that there is a notice mentioned on the receipt that was given to Vincent by Claude while purchasing the paint. According to this notice Claude cannot be held liable for the loss that may be caused by it. This receipt was given while purchasing the paint. Similarly there was also a sign present on the counter on which the same words have been repeated. As a result, Claude refuses to pay compensation on account of these notices. As a result, it needs to be decided in this case if these exemption clauses can protect Claude from paying compensation for the damage caused to the building of Vincent’s client worth $20,000 by the defective paint and also for the damage that had been caused by the cans of paint that had exploded in Vincent’s store room, causing damage to art work worth $40,000.
Legal Rules: In context of contract law, an exclusion clause can be described as the term of the contract through which one party tries to limit or exclude its liability for the breach of contract. For example, in case of contract between A and B, it may be provided that in case of a negligence by B’s employee, B cannot be held liable for the breach of contract or it can also be provided that if B is found guilty of the breach of contract, in such a case, B will not be liable to pay more than $500 as damages. It needs to be noted that such exclusion clauses are generally effective, if they have been properly drafted and at the same time, they have been incorporated in the contract. Therefore, in order to rely on an exclusion clause, it is required that this type of clause has been properly incorporated in the contract and at the same time, it is also required that it should not be against the law.
