加拿大论文代写：不同地区的婚姻制度分析
婚姻是大多数社区和宗教的一种文化，自几个世纪以来随着人类日益增长的愿望和要求而不断演变。婚姻是一种文化，可以说是对自然的一种回答，因为自然没有文化价值，更持久、更透明、更开放。婚姻是一种制度，人们用来赋予他们的愿望的意义，寻求一些永久的东西，作为一个终生的情感，身体，社会，和全天候的伴侣(de Jonge, 2011)。
在西方国家，婚姻被认为是一种纯粹的制度，尤其是在基督教中，夫妻彼此相爱，在教堂里当着他们神圣的上帝的面做出承诺，这表明他们在整个西方国家的社会结构中有着非常牢固的承诺。它从几个世纪以来一直在发展，从那时到现在一直在发展，甚至今天，人们从无数的角度来看待婚姻，通过各种类型的人，这是相互冲突的。因此,当有一个代沟在关于婚姻的观点,这表明形成的社会结构是不完整的和绝对的理性选择理论所认为的,它不能被论证的基础,因为它并不反映出一个普遍的社会结构的整体意义的婚姻。
在中东国家，婚姻再次成为传统，穆斯林宗教有不同的观点，如果有机会，一个人可以娶不止一个女人。这在穆斯林世界是一种纯粹的宗教信仰，它再次来自于定义婚姻制度的宗教价值观的社会学视角。在穆斯林世界，宗教更多地参与到婚姻中，并主导着其对更广泛的社会结构的定义和形成。也有例外，因为穆斯林世界也有关于婚姻的内部冲突，而且他们自己的宗教也有强调男性和女性之间的罪恶婚姻的重要性的分支。因此，在中东国家，婚姻形成的社会结构更加矛盾。
Marriage is a culture in most communities and religions and it has been evolving since centuries after adjusting with the growing aspirations and demands of humankind. Marriage is a culture which can be said to be an answer to nature, because nature has not cultural values and is more permanent, transparent, and open. Marriage is an institution that people use to give meaning to their desires of seeking something permanent and someone as a life-long emotional, physical, social, and an all-weather partner (de Jonge, 2011).
In the western countries, marriage is considered to be a pure institution especially in Christianity, where the couple fall in love with each other and make commitments in front of their holy God in the church, indicating a very solid commitment in the entire social structure of the western countries. It has evolved since centuries and has been evolving ever since and even today, marriage is seen in innumerable perspective through all types of generations of people which are conflicting. Thus, when there is a generational gap in perspectives about marriage, it indicates that the social structure formed is not complete and absolute as supposed by the rational choice theory and that it cannot be the basis of the argument as it is not reflecting the entirety of the social structure that gives a universal meaning to marriage.
In the Middle Eastern countries, marriage is again traditional and the Muslim religion has a different perspective where a make can marry more than one women if given a chance. This is a pure religious belief in the Muslim world, and it is again coming from a sociological perspective of religious values defining marriage institution. Religion is more involving in marriage in the Muslim world and dominates its definition and formation of the broader social structure. There are exceptions also as the Muslim worlds also have internal conflicts about marriage and there are branches of its own religion that stresses the importance of a sin gel marriage between a male and a women. Thus, the social structure formed about marriage is more conflicting in the Middle Eastern countries.
加拿大论文代写 ：不同地区的婚姻制度分析
欧洲再次与美国相似，但它也有自己的无神论者，他们对婚姻有着不同的信仰。对一些人来说，这可能不是一种情感支持，而是一种不可避免的罪恶，就像不信教的祖先强加给他们的，他们对结婚的必要性缺乏理性。不同血统的欧洲人对婚姻有不同的信仰，他们认为婚姻是神圣的、纯粹的、戏剧性的、以需求为基础的、仅仅是身体上的、仅仅是情感上的等等。因此，欧洲的婚姻制度有着不同的假设，并来自于对自身社会结构理解的不同解读。
亚洲国家在将婚姻视为个人生活中最神圣的事件方面，态度最为激进，往往认为婚姻是两个灵魂的结合。这一制度只建立在异性之间的单一婚姻的基础上，他们更倾向于终生遵循这一制度。在这个宗教中也有成功的婚姻和失败的婚姻，即使它被认为是神圣和纯洁的。因此，婚姻在亚洲是更有意义的事件，形成了整个家庭中最重要的事件，更不用说结婚的个人。
因此，无论结婚的夫妇出于什么原因，婚姻都是两种相反性别结合的预兆，这种信仰构成了婚姻及其在各种宗教和社会的社会结构中发展的最共同特征(Fine, 1982)。许多人认为婚姻是必要的，然而也有一些人否认婚姻的必要性，相反，他们提出并提倡自由的思想和行动，满足个人的需要，而没有对生活作出承诺。这一特殊的信念，即满足个人的需要时，当它出现，与经济学家的信念，个人寻求金融自由和幸福为自己。然而，经济学家关于利用个人追求金钱、幸福和成功生活的欲望的信念，与人们对婚姻的理解是完全不同的。如果认为个人满足了他们对婚姻的需要，就像暂时的状况，然后分开，这将是一个混乱的局面，婚姻作为一种制度将削弱其在大多数宗教中的地位。
Europe is again similar to the US, but it has its own share of atheists who have varied belief of marriage. For some, it may not be an emotional support but a necessary evil as imposed by the unreligious ancestors who have poor reasoning about the necessity of marrying. Europeans who are of different origins have different beliefs of marriage from considering it as holy, pure, dramatic, need-based, physical only, emotional only, etc. Thus, the institution of marriage in Europe has various assumptions and comes from different interpretation of their own understanding of social structures.
Asian countries are more the most aggressive about considering marriage as the most holy event in an individual life and considers it often as the union of two souls. The institution is based on a single marriage only between individuals of opposite gender, and they are more inclined to follow it through life. There has been successful marriages and failed marriages in this religion also, even though after it being considered to be holy and pure. Thus, marriage is more meaningful event in Asia and forms the most important event in the entire family, let alone the individuals tying the knot.
Marriage is thus the harbinger of union of two opposite genders for whatever reasons sought for by the marrying couple, and this belief forms the most common denominator of marriage and its development in the social structure of various religions and societies (Fine, 1982). Marriage is seen as a necessity by many, whereas there are people who deny its necessity and instead propose and promote free thinking action and satisfy individual needs without getting into a commitment for life. This particular belief of satisfying the needs of individuals as and when it arises, coincides with the economists’ belief of individuals seeking financial freedom and happiness for themselves. However, the acceptance of the economists’ belief about using individual desires of seeking money, happiness, and successful life is completely different from what is understood about marriage. If it is believed that individual satisfy their needs arising for marriage like situation for time being and then separate, it would be a chaotic situation and marriage as an institution will weaken its stand in most religions.
