今天为大家分享一篇优秀的论文范文-加拿大论文代写：文化的管理。本文讲述的是对文化的管理观点将有利于在组织中通过以下方式促进道德决策。首先，它将帮助管理者对组织和员工之间的目标冲突如何存在更加敏感。冲突的目标可以被管理者理解为仅仅是基于文化的误解。其次，它帮助管理层感知从文化角度看似乎不那么值得谴责的伦理问题的形式，并相应地培训其资源(Pitta等，1999)。如果需要更多更全的加拿大论文代写范文资料，请联系我们的客服。
管理观点如何影响基于文化的良好道德
加拿大论文代写：文化的管理
例如，从教育机构和管理的角度来看，剽窃被认为是北美教育机构的一个问题(Bartels et al.， 1998;陈等，1998)。同样的价值也被推广到工作组织中，当一个人陈述一个想法时，他明白需要引用他的资料并给予原作者应有的信任。另一方面，世界上其他的教育机构都很强调死记硬背。学生们会死记硬背资料，然后在工作中使用这种大规模的死记硬背，他们会意识不到频繁引用的必要性，甚至会认为这是知识进步的阻碍。现在，当管理者意识到文化差异时，他们就能更好地对伦理进行连续的理解。
加拿大论文代写：文化的管理
Buck等人(2001)在他的作品中试图呈现三个因素，当涉及到促进伦理决策时，不考虑文化的影响。目前这项工作是针对教育背景提出的，但同样适用于组织和机构的标准协议。首先，顾问或管理者必须确保他们不会选择中立或规定性这两个极端。中立是指人在一个中立的模型中操作，不愿对学生实施规则的立场(Buck等，2001)。在这个讨论的背景下，被认为类似于Buck等人(2001)提到的学生的组织的员工可能可以自由地做他们想做的任何事情。对他们的指导非常少，而且期望他们能跟上预期的道德标准，而不管他们的文化立场如何。另一方面，在一个公开规定的顾问或经理的情况下，可能会有一种使用权威来提出意见、意见和建议的倾向。这又是一个管理缺陷，因为在这些组织工作的人认为他们的观点没有得到尊重。在文化敏感的情况下，员工甚至认为他们的组织没有适应文化。管理者必须在中性和规范性之间保持平衡。这种平衡的工作方式将确保这个人能够在一个成功的团队中工作。当管理者理解道德决策的文化含义时，他们会更加鼓励员工。然而，在这种情况下，可以说在鼓励行为和劝阻行为之间取得平衡是恰当的。最后，正如巴克等人(2001)所指出的，在判断行为和非judegemental行为之间存在着划分。这也需要根据上下文进行批判性的理解。
加拿大论文代写：文化的管理
How Managerial Perspectives Could Influence Good Ethics Based on Culture
Managerial perspectives on culture would be beneficial for ethical decision making promotion in the organization in the following ways. Firstly, it will help the managers be more responsive to how conflicting goals between an organization and its employees exist. The conflicting goals can be understood by managers as merely a misintereptation based on culture. Seconldy, it helps the management to perceieve the form of ethical issues that seem less blameable from a cultural standpoint and it can train its resources accordingly (Pitta et al., 1999). For instance, from the educational institution and management perspective, plagiarism is considered an issue in North American educational institutions (Bartels et al., 1998; Chen, et al., 1998). The same value also is pushed onto work organizations where a person presenting an idea understands the need to cite his sources and give due credit to the original author. On the other hand in other educational insittutons around the world much emphasis is given to memorization of sources. Students would memorize sources and then use this vast memorization in their work and they would fail to appreciate the need for frequent citations and might even consider that a hindersnace to knowledge progress. Now where the managers are aware of cultural difference they can better romote a continuum of understanding on ethics.
加拿大论文代写：文化的管理
Buck et al. (2001) in his work attempts to present three elements when it comes to promoting ethical decision making irrespective of cultural influnces. Now this work is presented for educational background but is equally applicable in organizations and institutuions standard protocol. Firstly, the advisors or managers must ensure that they do not pick the two extremes of being neutral or being prescriptive. Being neutral is that standpoint where the person operate in a neutral model where they are reluctant to enforce rules on student (Buck et al, 2001). In this context of discussion, employees of an organization considered analogous to the students that Buck et al (2001) refers to, might be free to do whatever they want. Very minimal guidance is given to them and they are expected to catch on to the expected ethical standards irrespective of their cultural standpoints. On the other hand in the case of an advisor or manager who is overtly prescriptive, there could be a tendency to use authority in order to make opinions, judegements and recommednations. This is again a managerial flaw as people working in such organizations believe their viewpoint is not being respected. In very culturally sensitive situations the employees even believe that their organization is not being culturally accommodative. It is necessary for managers to work in a balanced way between neutral and prescriptive. This balanced style of working will ensure that the person in question is able to work on a successful team. The managers can be more encouraging when they understand cultural implications on ethical decision making. However, in this case it can be said that a balance between encouraging behavior and discouraging behavior would be appropriate. Finally as Buck et al. (2001) presents there is a division between judgemental behavior and non-judegemental behavior. This would also need to be critically understood based on context.
