本篇论文代写-气候变化带来的影响讲了对气候变化的怀疑和质疑促使人们发展更好的科学。重要的是要确保科学发展出一个框架来解决怀疑者的问题。反诉变得无力，因为人们在没有确凿证据的情况下拒绝气候变化。人们利用他们的信仰系统作为一种灵活的信息获取方式。他们用他们的信仰作为了解这些信息的途径。本篇论文代写文章由加拿大第一论文 Assignment First辅导网整理，供大家参考阅读。
Counterclaim: “Climate change is not real.”
Scepticism and questioning of the climate change cause the people to develop better science. It is important to ensure that the science would develop a framework to address the questions of the sceptics. The counterclaim becomes weak because the people reject the climate change without tangible proof. The people use their system of faith as a flexible way of knowing the information. They use their faith as the way of knowing this information. The people claim that the earth will continue to exist no matter the acts of humans in the world. There is no data which is collated to prove that the climate change in the environment is not real. However, it can be refuted by reason and the two areas of knowledge. The fact that reason can be manipulated is by using the faith of the individuals. The individuals use this scope of reason even to manipulate the information. Even historical data is changed based on these facts, the data from the natural sciences can be used to explore about the reason. This is the reason for using other tools of knowledge. This is the reason for the counterclaim to be a weak claim. It needs to be considered in this scheme that the people need to accept this information as it is based on tangible data which is not based on emotions or other tangible information. This is the reason for the tangible information to not be real in these cases.
Part 2: Ethics
“There were detrimental climate changes in history.”
Definition: Ethics involve the discussion about how people need to live their lives according to the societal mandates. There is distinction made between right and wrong in this paradigm. These implications are divided in the society. Ethics and morality are two different notions. Ethics is about the justification of the actions.
Example: By using the example of climate change, the impact of adhering to the ethical notions can be explained.
By using the area of knowledge, it was stated that the climate change and the impact of the climate change in the past were not based on human activity. There is unscrupulous use of the resources in the environment. These showcases how the people’s justification of their actions plays a vital role in the interpretation of the facts. From this, it can be stated that the justification of the actions are often impacted by reason. There are still certain gaps in climate change data. Owing to this, the counter claimer states that faith plays an important role in the learning of the subject. However, reason refutes this based on the number of instances and tangible information. These showcase the importance of climate changes in the past. From this, the impact of robust knowledge and its importance is comprehended.