本篇温哥华代写-HomiBhabha的理论讲了在后殖民主义批评家中，HomiBhabha最为清晰地表达了反抗在结构间隙中的发展，在结构间隙中反抗的机会将被权力抹去。巴哈最理想的假设是由于整体暴露而产生的霸权。众所周知，巴巴的反应是使用讽刺的窥探策略。这些机构的作者令人困惑。霍米·巴巴在后殖民研究中有很强的发言权。本篇温哥华代写文章由加拿大第一论文 Assignment First辅导网整理，供大家参考阅读。
Among the critics of post-colonialism, HomiBhabha is the most articulate one to express the development of resistance in the structural interstices under which the chances of resistance will be erased by power. The most desirable assumption made by Bhabha is hegemony due to the overall exposure. Bhabha is known to respond by using strategies of ironic prying. These present a confused authorship of agency. Homi Bhabha has a strong voice in post-colonial research. However, this is highly affected by Western theorists and post-structuralists such as Michael Foucault, Jacques Lacan and Jacques Derrida. Bhabha also used concepts like liminality, hybridity, interstice, and mimicry in “The Location of Culture” (1994). All of these concepts were affected by Lacanian psychoanalysis and semiotics for arguing that production of culture is mostly productive in case of ambivalence.
The thesis statement that would be probed is that root cause analysis of the cultural mimicry and the issues regarding stereotyping is generally found to be negative. Hence, this essay first discusses the role of postcolonial theory in social thought considering the development of Bhabha as a literary theorist. Further ahead, the essay will focus on how Bhabha’s concepts are applied in the fields of Anthropology, sociology, and cultural studies. Finally, key points of conclusion will be drafted while linking Bhabha’s thoughts on post-colonialism with post-structuralism.